DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese expert system company that develops open-source large language models (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the business in 2023 and acts as its CEO.
The DeepSeek-R1 design provides reactions comparable to other modern large language designs, such as OpenAI's GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a significantly lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI's GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of an equivalent LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek's AI models were developed amidst United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were meant to limit the capability of these two nations to develop sophisticated AI systems. [6] [7]
On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek launched its very first complimentary chatbot app, based upon the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had actually gone beyond ChatGPT as the most-downloaded complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] triggering Nvidia's share price to visit 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek's success versus bigger and more recognized competitors has actually been referred to as "overthrowing AI", [8] making up "the first chance at what is emerging as a global AI area race", [11] and ushering in "a new age of AI brinkmanship". [12]
DeepSeek makes its generative synthetic intelligence algorithms, models, and training details open-source, permitting its code to be easily available for usage, adjustment, watching, and developing documents for constructing purposes. [13] The business apparently strongly recruits young AI researchers from leading Chinese universities, [8] and works with from outside the computer system science field to diversify its designs' knowledge and abilities. [3]
In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI lover Liang Wenfeng, who had actually been trading because the 2007-2008 financial crisis while going to Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on establishing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer specifically used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative expert system chatbot open source, indicating its code is easily readily available for use, modification, and watching. This includes permission to gain access to and use the source code, as well as design documents, for building purposes. [13]
According to 36Kr, Liang had actually developed up a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are utilized to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip restrictions on China. [15]
In April 2023, High-Flyer began a synthetic general intelligence laboratory dedicated to research developing AI tools separate from High-Flyer's monetary service. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the investors, the lab became its own business, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Venture capital firms were hesitant in offering financing as it was unlikely that it would be able to generate an exit in a brief time period. [15]
After releasing DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which used strong performance for a low cost, DeepSeek ended up being called the catalyst for China's AI design rate war. It was rapidly called the "Pinduoduo of AI", and other significant tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the rate of their AI models to take on the business. Despite the low cost charged by DeepSeek, it was profitable compared to its competitors that were losing money. [20]
DeepSeek is concentrated on research and has no detailed plans for commercialization; [20] this likewise allows its innovation to avoid the most rigid provisions of China's AI guidelines, such as needing consumer-facing technology to adhere to the government's controls on information. [3]
DeepSeek's working with preferences target technical capabilities rather than work experience, leading to many brand-new hires being either current university graduates or designers whose AI professions are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the business hires people with no computer system science background to assist its innovation understand other subjects and understanding locations, consisting of being able to produce poetry and perform well on the infamously challenging Chinese college admissions exams (Gaokao). [3]
Development and release history
DeepSeek LLM
On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek released its very first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is offered for free to both researchers and industrial users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license contract ("DeepSeek license") relating to "open and accountable downstream use" for the design itself. [21]
They are of the very same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series includes 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]
1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base models.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of direction information. This produced the Instruct models.
They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]
On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B specifications in both Base and Chat forms (no Instruct was released). It was established to compete with other LLMs offered at the time. The paper claimed benchmark outcomes higher than many open source LLMs at the time, particularly Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]
The architecture was basically the same as those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text acquired by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]
The Chat variations of the 2 Base designs was also released concurrently, gotten by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]
On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B specifications (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was basically the exact same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared equivalent efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variant of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with "shared specialists" that are constantly queried, and "routed specialists" that may not be. They found this to assist with expert balancing. In standard MoE, some professionals can end up being overly depended on, while other professionals may be seldom utilized, wasting specifications. Attempting to balance the professionals so that they are equally used then causes experts to reproduce the exact same capability. They proposed the shared experts to learn core capabilities that are frequently utilized, and let the routed professionals to discover the peripheral capabilities that are hardly ever utilized. [28]
In April 2024, they released 3 DeepSeek-Math models specialized for doing math: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]
1. Initialize with a previously pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K math problems and their tool-use-integrated detailed options. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The reward model was a process reward design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd method. [30] This reward model was then utilized to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K math questions "associated to GSM8K and MATH". The reward design was continuously updated during training to avoid reward hacking. This led to the RL model.
V2
In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series consists of 4 designs, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The two bigger models were trained as follows: [31]
1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M instances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This led to DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not launched.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in 2 stages. The very first stage was trained to resolve math and coding problems. This phase used 1 benefit model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for mathematics). The second phase was trained to be handy, safe, and follow guidelines. This phase utilized 3 benefit models. The helpfulness and security benefit designs were trained on human choice information. The rule-based benefit model was by hand configured. All experienced benefit models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This resulted in the launched version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.
They went with 2-staged RL, because they discovered that RL on reasoning data had "special characteristics" different from RL on general data. For instance, RL on thinking might improve over more training steps. [31]
The 2 V2-Lite designs were smaller sized, and qualified likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only went through SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to assist "further research study and advancement on MLA and DeepSeekMoE". [31]
Architecturally, the V2 models were significantly modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They changed the standard attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head hidden attention (MLA), and used the mix of specialists (MoE) alternative previously released in January. [28]
The Financial Times reported that it was cheaper than its peers with a rate of 2 RMB for every million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab's leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]
In June 2024, they released 4 designs in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]
1. The Base designs were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the version at the end of pretraining), then pretrained further for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base models.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were utilized to produce 20K code-related and 30K math-related guideline information, then integrated with an instruction dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for math issues was calculated by comparing to the ground-truth label. The reward for code problems was produced by a reward model trained to anticipate whether a program would pass the unit tests.
DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and upgraded in December 2024. It was made by integrating DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]
V3
In December 2024, they released a base model DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The design architecture is essentially the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]
1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, primarily English and Chinese. It consisted of a greater ratio of math and shows than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, using YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 epochs on 1.5 M samples of thinking (math, programming, logic) and non-reasoning (imaginative writing, roleplay, simple concern answering) data. Reasoning data was generated by "expert models". Non-reasoning information was created by DeepSeek-V2.5 and examined by human beings. - The "expert designs" were trained by beginning with an unspecified base design, then SFT on both data, and synthetic data generated by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system timely asked the R1 to show and validate during thinking. Then the specialist models were RL using an unspecified benefit function.
- Each professional design was trained to create just artificial reasoning data in one particular domain (math, programming, reasoning).
- Expert models were utilized, rather of R1 itself, since the output from R1 itself suffered "overthinking, poor format, and extreme length".
4. Model-based benefit models were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human choice information containing both last benefit and chain-of-thought leading to the last reward. The reward design produced reward signals for both concerns with unbiased however free-form answers, and concerns without objective answers (such as imaginative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both reward designs and rule-based benefit. The rule-based reward was calculated for mathematics issues with a final response (put in a box), and for programs problems by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.
The DeepSeek group carried out substantial low-level engineering to attain efficiency. They used mixed-precision arithmetic. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) instead of the basic 32-bit, requiring special GEMM regimens to accumulate properly. They utilized a custom 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They minimized the interaction latency by overlapping thoroughly computation and interaction, such as devoting 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU interaction. They reduced communication by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the specific device each expert was on in order to avoid certain machines being queried more frequently than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing methods. [37]
After training, it was deployed on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are connected by NVLink, and the clusters are linked by InfiniBand. [37]
Benchmark tests reveal that DeepSeek-V3 outshined Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]
R1
On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview became available by means of DeepSeek's API, in addition to through a chat interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for sensible inference, mathematical reasoning, and real-time analytical. DeepSeek declared that it went beyond efficiency of OpenAI o1 on standards such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal specified when it used 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached a service quicker than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]
On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek released DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company also launched some "DeepSeek-R1-Distill" designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, but instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial information created by R1. [47]
A discussion between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant solves it. The assistant initially thinks of the reasoning process in the mind and after that supplies the user with the answer. The reasoning procedure and answer are confined within and tags, respectively, i.e., reasoning procedure here respond to here. User:. Assistant:
DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained specifically utilizing GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they utilized no model-based benefit. All benefit functions were rule-based, "mainly" of 2 types (other types were not specified): precision rewards and format benefits. Accuracy benefit was inspecting whether a boxed answer is correct (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for programs). Format benefit was examining whether the model puts its thinking trace within ... [47]
As R1-Zero has concerns with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to attend to these problems and additional enhance reasoning: [47]
1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on "thousands" of "cold-start" data all with the basic format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the same RL process as R1-Zero, but also with a "language consistency benefit" to motivate it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal model not released.
3. Synthesize 600K reasoning data from the internal design, with rejection sampling (i.e. if the generated thinking had an incorrect last answer, then it is gotten rid of). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, factual QA, self-cognition, translation) utilizing DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K artificial information for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based benefit (for thinking jobs) and model-based benefit (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.
Distilled models were trained by SFT on 800K information synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar method as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]
Assessment and responses
DeepSeek released its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 model as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had exceeded ChatGPT as the highest-rated totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot apparently answers concerns, solves reasoning issues and writes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the marketplace, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI companies. [3]
DeepSeek-V3 uses substantially less resources compared to its peers; for instance, whereas the world's leading AI companies train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as lots of as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek claims to have needed only about 2,000 GPUs, specifically the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at a cost of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is approximately one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta invested developing its newest AI innovation. [3]
DeepSeek's competitive performance at relatively minimal cost has actually been acknowledged as possibly challenging the international supremacy of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a "Sputnik minute" for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 design was apparently "on par with" among OpenAI's latest models when utilized for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language reasoning; [51] echoing other commentators, American Silicon Valley investor Marc Andreessen similarly explained R1 as "AI's Sputnik minute". [51]
DeepSeek's creator, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media widely praised DeepSeek as a national property. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China's Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his seminar with specialists and asked him to offer viewpoints and recommendations on a draft for comments of the yearly 2024 federal government work report. [55]
DeepSeek's optimization of limited resources has highlighted prospective limitations of United States sanctions on China's AI development, which include export restrictions on advanced AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company's AI models as a result "sparked market turmoil" [57] and caused shares in major international technology business to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia's stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech companies also sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google's owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] An international selloff of innovation stocks on Nasdaq, triggered by the release of the R1 model, had resulted in tape-record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer system hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of worth was cleaned off American stocks. [50]
Leading figures in the American AI sector had blended reactions to DeepSeek's success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose companies are associated with the United States government-backed "Stargate Project" to establish American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek "super remarkable". [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable development. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed apprehension of the app's performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, consisting of Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to utilize the design in their program. [68]
On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek limited its brand-new user registration to phone numbers from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a "large-scale" cyberattack interfered with the correct performance of its servers. [69] [70]
Some sources have observed that the official application shows interface (API) variation of R1, which runs from servers found in China, uses censorship mechanisms for topics that are thought about politically delicate for the government of China. For instance, the model refuses to answer questions about the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, comparisons between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI may initially generate a response, however then deletes it quickly afterwards and replaces it with a message such as: "Sorry, that's beyond my present scope. Let's discuss something else." [72] The integrated censorship systems and constraints can only be removed to a minimal level in the open-source version of the R1 model. If the "core socialist worths" specified by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are touched upon, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, discussions are terminated. [74] When tested by NBC News, DeepSeek's R1 explained Taiwan as "an inalienable part of China's territory," and specified: "We securely oppose any kind of 'Taiwan independence' separatist activities and are committed to accomplishing the total reunification of the motherland through tranquil ways." [75] In January 2025, Western researchers were able to fool DeepSeek into providing certain responses to some of these topics by requesting in its response to switch certain letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]
Security and privacy
Some specialists fear that the government of China might use the AI system for foreign influence operations, spreading out disinformation, security and the advancement of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek's privacy terms and conditions say "We store the info we collect in safe servers found in the People's Republic of China ... We may collect your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other material that you offer to our design and Services". Although the data storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT's privacy policy, [79] a Wired article reports this as security issues. [80] In response, the Italian information defense authority is seeking extra details on DeepSeek's collection and usage of personal data, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had actually begun a nationwide security review. [81] [82] Taiwan's government banned making use of DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security grounds and South Korea's Personal Information Protection Commission opened a query into DeepSeek's use of individual details. [83]
Artificial intelligence market in China.
Notes
^ a b c The variety of heads does not equivalent the variety of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview required choosing "Deep Think enabled", and every user might use it just 50 times a day.
References
^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). "China's cheap, open AI model DeepSeek thrills researchers". Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). "The DeepSeek panic exposes an AI world prepared to blow". The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). "How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). "DeepSeek's more affordable designs and weaker chips call into concern trillions in AI facilities spending". Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). "Biden admin's cap on GPU exports might hit India's AI ambitions". The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). "Nvidia examination signals broadening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly". Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). "Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe". BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). "What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?". The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). "China's DeepSeek AI dethrones ChatGPT on App Store: Here's what you ought to know". CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). "What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to drop?". CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). "Nvidia, Microsoft shares topple as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants". ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). "Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I." The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). "ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta's LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key". Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). "How a leading Chinese AI design overcame US sanctions". MIT Technology Review. Archived from the initial on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). "Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker". ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). "Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I." CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023)." [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won't Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says". Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). "Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is altering how AI models are trained". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). "The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI leader". Financial Times. Archived from the initial on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). "Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China's AI Race". ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ "DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder". GitHub. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming - The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ "DeepSeek Coder". deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ "deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face". huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ "config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at main". huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ "config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at main". huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ "deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face". huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ "config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at primary". huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). "Chinese start-up DeepSeek's new AI design surpasses Meta, OpenAI items". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). "DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, surpasses Llama and Qwen on launch". VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). "DeepSeek's brand-new AI design appears to be among the best 'open' oppositions yet". TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ "Deepseek Log in page". DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ "News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: letting loose supercharged reasoning power!". DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). "DeepSeek's very first thinking model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance". VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). "Don't Look Now, however China's AI Is Catching Up Fast". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ "Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce". GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ "Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store". Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). "American AI has reached its Sputnik moment". The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). "' Sputnik moment': $1tn wiped off US stocks after Chinese company reveals AI chatbot" - by means of The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). "Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets". BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). "What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business". CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ "DeepSeek positions an obstacle to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley". The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). "Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika states". Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). "量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 ， 他还创办了" AI界拼多多"". finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). "Chinese AI business's AI model advancement highlights limits of US sanctions". Tom's Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ "DeepSeek updates - Chinese AI chatbot sparks US market chaos, wiping $500bn off Nvidia". BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). "Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap". Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). "DeepSeek stimulates global AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth". Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). "DeepSeek, Calling It 'Impressive' however Staying Skeptical". Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). "Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella promotes DeepSeek's open-source AI as "extremely impressive": "We need to take the advancements out of China extremely, extremely seriously"". Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). "OpenAI's Sam Altman calls DeepSeek design 'remarkable'". The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). "Trump calls China's DeepSeek AI app a 'wake-up call' after tech stocks slide". The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). "Johnson slams China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek advancement "positive"". Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). "China's A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street" - via NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). "Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders say on DeepSeek's interruption". Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ "Elon Musk 'questions' DeepSeek's claims, recommends huge Nvidia GPU facilities". Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. "Big AWS clients, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models". Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). "DeepSeek struck with 'massive' cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app shops". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. "DeepSeek briefly limited new sign-ups, mentioning 'massive malicious attacks'". Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). "Chinese AI has actually triggered a $1 trillion panic - and it doesn't appreciate totally free speech". The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). "DeepSeek: This is what live censorship looks like in the Chinese AI chatbot". Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). "We checked out DeepSeek. It worked well, up until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ "The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the increase of chaos". The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). "Chinese AI DeepSeek shocks Silicon Valley, giving the AI race its 'Sputnik moment'". NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). "China's DeepSeek AI presents powerful cyber, data personal privacy hazards". Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). "Experts urge care over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). "DeepSeek's success has actually painted a big TikTok-shaped target on its back". LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ "Privacy policy". Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). "DeepSeek's Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ "Italy regulator looks for details from DeepSeek on data defense". Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). "White House evaluates result of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, official states". Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
.webp)
